-------------------- The Crazy Old Wizard's Domain is a message board for positive discussion of many subjects. The Undiscovered Country is our Star Trek board. COWD.net is a website devoted to reporting and consolidating interesting news items. Join us. Posts: 4069 | From: Maryland | Registered: Jun 1999
| IP: Logged |
quote:The base of this argument is about the very morals and ethics that admins and "board leaders" should or shouldn't have.
No it isn't. It's about a reduntant thread being closed. You know, we all know it. If it were more than that, you'd answer Mandard's question which I have tossed back at you. You'd reply logically and without venom. You'd quit side stepping everyone's replies and twisting them to suit you. You would bring more proof to this discussion instead of whining that your thread was closed and it's unfair.
Mandard was not "very intent on closing your thread". He simply closed one of many threads that was a repeat; upholding the rule he made about multiple threads on the same thing.
No one ever said these boards were a democracy. I believe the Mods and Admins do have a sense of morals and ethics just the same as everyone else; probably more so than some. Because your thread got closed, you're questioning that? I don't see the connection outside of Mandard sticking by his guns that there would be ONE thread on that particular topic.
quote:At the very heart of the argument about the therad that I started, is whether you consider the thread to be talking about the title of Episode 2, or the retro-feel of Star Wars itself.
Quite hiding behind this and just admit it was about the title and you're angry that it was close.
quote:The point I am trying to get across is that Star Wars itself has always been styled in sort of a Flash Gordon early 50's cheesy, serial..retro thing,...you see what I am getting at. Therefore the fact that ATOC sounds sort of cheesy makes it fall in line with the rest of the series. I expect to see a silly title for Episode III too.
I will be surprised if this thread doesn't get closed too. Once again at the heart of it is the whole title debate.
At this point if I was Mandard, I'd just delete both your threads; and if I was JA or DP I'd slap a 48 hour ban on you.
posted
Lucky for us he stopped reading. Now we can pants him, and he'll be none the wiser.
Posts: 18143 | From: Indianapolis | Registered: Jul 1999
| IP: Logged |
posted
D-Ray...oh how I hate explaining things more than once. So, I will not. You can go back and read my first post in this thread for the answer you seek.
You are now trying to turn the issue of you having a thread closed into some argument about our morals, your rights...hell I don't really know what you are arguing about at this point.
Here is the bottom line, you posted a redundant thread, and Mandard closed it like he does all redundant threads...and will continue to do. Now you are unhappy because your thread was closed. So to you it is obviously an issue about you and it has NOTHING to do with morals or rights.
I see that you are planning something...maybe flooding the boards to "win" this argument. I suggest you do not do that, if you do I promise you that you will not return.
And JA is not going to overrule Mandard or I on this issue....just so you know.
I hope I made myself clear on this once and for all, if not feel free to PM or e-mail me.
Topic Closed
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
Why don't you go take a gander in the prequels board my dear?
